List of Services
The main services of Qualityproofreading.co.uk are proofreading, editing and writings. However, the company proofreaders and editors do not know ABC of various kind of proofreading formats such as MLA, APA etc. Those are no qualified professionals, but just freelancers. Their delivered work is always irrelevant to client instructions. Also, no facility of revision is provided to them, once the work is submitted to them by this company. So, this company is not trustworthy for any kind of help.
This is an expensive company. Qualityproofreading.co.uk services charges are high than other services. The cost this firm charge for 10 pages proofreading is $200, which is more than average. Students cannot afford such high prices. Also, company work is irrelevant to client prescriptions, and no guarantee of refund is offered to the. Contrary, the firm threats clients when they ask for a refund. The company threats them to contact their universities. So, economically and personally this company is not a good choice.
User Reviews on qualityproofreading.co.uk Writing Service
Users of this company are not happy with this firm. their dissatisfaction is represented by their feedbacks. Their reviews concerning these firms are given below.
“My main issue is the editing. The editing was certainly not sufficient for somebody of my near-native level English and therefore could’ve been much stronger. What I mean is that the editing level needs to be “stepped up” when it comes to people like myself who can write fairly well. In this case, you as a company need to consider allocating the “right” editor for this type of job. Overall I thought the editor did a good job with regards to proofreading, even though I did notice he didn’t focus enough on the footnotes as I found a couple of grammar mistakes there. In short, there was more proofreading and much less editing. As such, it wasn’t worth the £111 that I paid and I’m afraid I won’t be using your services anymore. If I just wanted to proofread then I would have gone with another company. As I said, I expected a higher quality of editing. Perhaps you may need to consider raising the return time from the current max. 72 hours to maybe a week so that editors can have sufficient time to deliver more sophisticated editing. Not everybody is in a rush to get their document back. Or simply make sure you assign the appropriate editor for the type of job, i.e. for authors who already possess a strong level of English but need that extra strengthening of academic language and flow.”
“This review won’t be about the quality of proofreading. In January I was asked to review my experience and I have already said that it was average because the editor used Indeed more than 10 times. After my review, I was contacted by the team member and offered compensation for 3000 words and asked if I could make my review less negative by adding that I had the issue for the first time, but they are usually very good. And I did it because it reflected reality. But the real horror started when I claimed these 3000 words and received the email saying (quoting): ‘Following your unfair Trustpilot review, we will not be assisting. Best of luck.’ I find this extremely rude and I am very upset that the service I used for more than 2 years let me down. I tried to email the company or call them seeking the explanation, but have not received the answer in the last 48 hours. And I don’t think they will ever answer. Just a tip: don’t hope that someone will pick up the phone, I called around 10 times and no one picked up. Qualityproofreading, I have not asked for the compensation and you offered it, and rejecting my request in this rude way is absolute nonsense and I think you should really reconsider your customer support. I have never had such a disgusting experience ever in my life.”
These reviews are taken from the following source: